Pandemic shows contrasts between US, European safety nets

Pandemic shows contrasts between US, European safety nets

Washington: The coronavirus pandemic is straining social safety nets across the globe and underlining sharp differences in approach between wealthy societies such as the United States and Europe.

In Europe, the collapse in business activity is triggering wage support programmes that are keeping millions on the job, for now. In contrast, in the United States more than 33.5 million people have applied for jobless benefits and the unemployment rate has soared to 14.7 per cent.

Congress has passed USD 2 trillion in emergency support, boosting jobless benefits and writing stimulus checks of up to USD 1,200 per taxpayer.

That is a pattern seen in earlier economic downturns, particularly the global financial crisis and the Great Recession. Europe depends on existing programmes kicking in that pump money into people’s pockets.

The US, on the other hand, relies on Congress taking action by passing emergency stimulus programmes, as it did in 2009 under President Barack Obama, and the recent rescue package under President Donald Trump.

Economist Andre Sapir, a senior fellow at the Bruegel research institute in Brussels, said budget policy in the US plays partly the role that Europe’s welfare system plays because the American welfare system is less generous and a recession can be much harsher on workers.

In downturns, US employees can lose their health insurance if they lose their job and there’s also a greater risk of losing one’s home through foreclosure. On the other hand, Europeans typically pay higher taxes, meaning they earn less in the good times.

In the US you need to keep pumping money into the economy so that people continue to be employed, because it is through being employed that they are protected,” said Sapir.

“Which is the better system? I’m not going into that discussion because that is really a huge issue. The US tends to rank below average on measures of social support among the 37 countries of the Organization for Economic Development and Cooperation, whose members are mostly developed democracies.

The US came last in people living in relative poverty, meaning living on half the median income or less, with 17.8 per cent. Countries like Iceland, Denmark, the Czech Republic and Finland have less than 6 per cent.

Here’s a look at how the social safety nets of the U.S. and Europe compare:


Americans on unemployment were collecting an average of about USD 372 weekly before the coronavirus struck. But that average could range from USD 215 in Mississippi to USD 543 in Hawaii. The rescue package gave jobless workers an additional USD 600 a week through July.

It also extended benefits to those who lost work as a result of the coronavirus outbreak, which could include parents who needed to leave their jobs because schools were closed. Most states offer six months of unemployment but the emergency legislation adds 13 weeks.

By comparison, Germany’s jobless benefit pays 60 per cent of previous salary for a year. France provides up to 75 per cent of the previous average daily wage for up to two years.

Unemployment benefits in France are on average 1,200 euros (USD 1,320) per month.

And there’s Europe’s short-hours programs, which pay most of worker salaries if companies put them on shorter hours through a temporary disruption. More than 10 million workers are being paid that way in Germany and about 12 million in France, helping hold eurozone unemployment to only a 0.1 percentage point increase in March over February, to 7.4 per cent

The US emergency package included money for cheap loans to businesses that can be forgiven if the money is used mostly for payroll.


Nearly half of Americans receive health insurance through their employers, while another 34 per cent get benefits through the government programs Medicare and Medicaid. Separately, 6 per cent are insured individually and 9 per cent in 2018 had no insurance at all.

In Europe, universal health coverage is the rule, generally funded by payroll or other taxes. One example is Britain’s National Health Service, which is funded by taxes and offers free care that costs the government 7 per cent of GDP per year.


US workers are entitled to unpaid family leave, but no federal law requires private employers to provide paid family leave. In the private sector, 16 per cent of workers had access to paid family leave as of March 2018. Some states offer paid family leave insurance for 4 to 10 weeks. The United States is the only country in the OECD to not offer paid leave to new mothers.

In France, by contrast, mothers are entitled to at least 16 weeks of leave for their first child and must take at least 8 weeks. From the third child onward, they are allowed 26 weeks.

Workers get a daily maternity leave allowance of up to 89 euros (USD 94.50). But some professions have their own more favorable deals, up to the complete payment of salaries.

Denmark gives 52 weeks of parental leave after a birth or adoption, to be shared by the parents; whether at full salary or not depends on workplace agreements. (AP)

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.