The Bijbehara-Langanbal road has historically served as an important route connecting several villages with Pahalgam. However, in recent times, tourists have reportedly been discouraged from using this route and are instead being directed towards the Khanabal Pahalgam road. Is it due to security concerns, or are there other administrative reasons?
Sabzar Ali
The Bijbehara Langanbal road has historically served as an important route connecting several claim villages with Pahalgam. Besides being a lifeline for residents, the road has also been used by tourists who wish to explore the region’s scenic beauty. However, in recent times, tourists have reportedly been discouraged from using this route and are instead being directed towards the Khanabal Pahalgam (KP) road.
This has raised an important question among the people of the residents: Is the Langanbal road effectively closed to tourists? Is it due to specific security concerns, or are there other administrative reasons behind the decision?
Security is undoubtedly a matter that must be assessed by the concerned agencies. The protection of both residents and visitors is a top priority, and no responsible citizen would argue otherwise. However, what confuses many people is that the entire stretch from Bijbehara to Langanbal already has a significant presence of security forces, including Jammu and Kashmir Police, CRPF personnel, and Army camps. Multiple checkpoints have also been established along the route.
Following the tragic incident at Baisaran, Pahalgam, the people of the region demonstrated humanity, courage, and solidarity. Locals from different villages extended help and support to tourists during a difficult time. Their actions were widely appreciated and reflected the hospitality for which Kashmir is known.
Given these realities, many residents believe that the existing security infrastructure could be utilised to facilitate rather than restrict tourist movement. If security personnel are already deployed across the route and checkpoints are operational, it may be possible to ensure both security and smooth travel for visitors.
Another aspect that deserves attention is the economic impact. Tourism is the backbone of Kashmir’s economy, and villages along the Bijbehara Langanbal route could benefit from increased tourist movement. Small businesses, transport operators, shopkeepers, vendors, and local entrepreneurs all stand to gain when visitors pass through the area. Restricting tourist access may unintentionally deprive these communities of valuable economic opportunities.
The issue is not merely about a road. It is about connectivity, public convenience, economic development, and ensuring that all regions receive a fair share of tourism-related benefits. If there are genuine security concerns, the administration should communicate them clearly. If the concerns can be addressed through enhanced monitoring and coordination, then reopening the route for tourists deserves serious consideration.
The people of the area are not demanding anything unreasonable. They are simply seeking clarity and requesting that the authorities review the present restrictions. A balanced approach that safeguards security while promoting tourism and regional development would serve the interests of everyone.
The administration may therefore examine whether tourists can be allowed to travel through the Bijbehara Langanbal road under appropriate security arrangements. Such a step would not only improve connectivity but would also send a positive message about confidence, normalcy, and the region’s readiness to welcome visitors.
The question remains: Can a solution be found that protects security while allowing this important route to contribute to the growth and prosperity of the area? The answer lies with the concerned authorities, and the people hope that this matter will receive thoughtful consideration.
sa*********@***il.com