New Delhi: Information about vaccines and autism available online can prove to be unreliable as it is often based on old, ‘weak’ scientific studies, and is contributing to the rise in anti-vaccination sentiments, a study has found.
For the study researchers carried out a search for ‘vaccines autism’ and then analysed the results for the top 200 websites.The study, published in the journal Frontiers in Immunology, found that people can get misinformed advice and information from the Internet, with 10-24% of websites having a negative stance on vaccines (20 % in the UK).
Although Google searches did not return such a website in the first 10 websites generated, searching on the UK and Australian versions of Google did. “This study reveals a pollution of the health information available to the public with misinformation that can potentially impact public health. It also shows that weak scientific studies can have a detrimental impact on the public,” said Pietro Ghezzi, a professor at Brighton and Sussex Medical School (BSMS) in the UK, who led the research.
Some vaccine-negative websites also ranked highly in the Italian, French, Mandarin Chinese, Portuguese and Arabic versions of the search engine. The way in which Google ranks websites in different languages could be a factor, but it could also be because these websites are visited more often in some countries, which would increase their ranking and the likelihood of people using them as a source of information.
Although vaccines are one of the most effective defences against some infections, many vaccines are still viewed negatively by a minority of parents. A major cause of negativity that surrounds vaccination uptake came from a 1998 publication by Dr Andrew Wakefield, a former British doctor who falsely linked the MMR (measles, mumps and rubella) vaccine to autism.
The paper eventually was retracted by the co-authors and The Lancet, the journal where the study was published. Despite this, the idea that vaccines can cause autism is still around, and parents continue to be exposed to this misinformation. “The approach of using Google search results to monitor the information available could be a useful tool for identifying countries at greater risk of misinformation,” said Ghezzi.