Nehru and Sheikh Abdullah were in the know about tribal invasion plans

The Indian narrative suggests that on October 27, 1947, it flew its troops to Kashmir to “save the Valley from tribal invasion”; and that India had no intention to capture Kashmir. However, the historical record available proves otherwise.
Ashq Hussain Bhat 
Ashq Hussain Bhat

Tribesmen of Pakistan entered the border town of Muzaffarabad in the early morning of October 22. Their masters had expected that by the same evening, they would be in the summer capital Srinagar located barely 100 miles away. However, it took them five days to cover 70 miles of Jhelum Valley Road to reach Baramulla on October 26. JVR, those days was one of the best maintained highways of Asia, yet it took them 5 days to reach the outskirts of Srinagar. Because their march was hampered by the opposition at Muzaffarabad itself. Later, at Uri it was Chief of Staff of Jammu and Kashmir Rifles, Brigadier Rajinder Singh Jamwal, who, with the assistance of Patiala State Forces delayed their march (p77 Kashmir: Birth of a Tragedy by Alastair Lamb).  The PSF arrived in Srinagar on October 17.  The PSF was a part of Indian army because Patiala state had acceded to India before the Transfer of Power. Maharaja Yadavindra Singh of Patiala could not have sent his troops to Kashmir without Delhi’s complicity.

When on October 27, India officially sent its troops to Kashmir their Prime Minister Jawaharlal Nehru claimed that the King of Kashmir had acceded to India. He promised Kashmiris that his government would conduct a plebiscite in the state on the question of whether they want to be a part of India or Pakistan. However, Nehru reneged on his promise. Nehru was aware that tribesmen would be entering Kashmir. The fact that he knew it in advance is revealed by what he wrote to Sardar Valabhai Patal on September 27, 1947, “I am writing to you about Kashmir…It is obvious to me from the many reports I have received that the situation there is dangerous and deteriorating. The Muslim League in the Punjab and NWFP are making preparations to enter Kashmir in considerable numbers. The approach of winter is going to cut off Kashmir from the rest of India. The only normal route there is via Jhelum Valley. The Jammu route can hardly be used during winter and air traffic is also suspended.” (p49   Sardar Patel’s Correspondence Vol. I).
Nehru did not deem it fit to inform Hari Singh, the ruler of Kashmir, of the trouble that was brewing for him in West Punjab and NWFP. Instead of advising Singh to take defensive measures, he wrote to Patel to be ready for the adventure: “Therefore it is important that something should be done before these winter conditions set in. This means practically by the end of October or at least the beginning of November. Indeed air traffic will be difficult even before that.” A question naturally arises: if Nehru was so desperate to help out Kashmiris against the invading tribesmen and also wanted to ascertain their wishes about their future, why did he wait for the tribal invasion to happen? He knew almost a month in advance that it was round the corner. Nehru did not warn Hari Singh because he wanted to corner him into acceding to India and also force him to share power with the National Conference. “It becomes important, therefore,” he wrote to Patel, “that the Maharaja should make friends with the NC so that there might be this popular support against Pakistan. Indeed, it seems to me that there is no other course open to the Maharaja but this: to release Sheikh Abdullah and the NC leaders, to make a friendly approach to them, seek their co-operation and make them feel that this is really meant, and then to declare adhesion to the Indian Union. Once the state accedes to India, it will become very difficult for Pakistan to invade it officially or unofficially without coming into conflict with the Indian Union.”
Accession to India was not something that Hari Singh was averse to. He also wished to accede to India but upon his own terms and conditions. But he was unwilling to share power with anyone. He had already dismissed his pro-independence Kashmiri Prime Minister RC Kak; and imported from India deputy prime ministers and prime ministers such as Janak Singh Katotch, Ram Lal Batra, and MC Mahajan. This was all to appease Indian leaders. Also he received Lt Col Kashmir Singh Katotch (son of Janak Singh) of the Indian army as the liaison officer between Indian army and Jammu Kashmir Rifles. But Nehru was unimpressed by these measures and with the prospect of mere accession. He was certain that accession without the semblance of some sort of popular support would not go well with the international community. Therefore, he was keen to see Sheikh Abdullah and his party rally for India. The NC was Kashmir’s strongest political party with a support base in Kashmir Valley and Nehru wanted the Valley for India. He cared little for Hari Singh. In fact, Hari Singh was disposable stuff.
In order to garner Patel’s support for his course of action – (they never saw eye to eye on any issue because dealing with princely states was Patel’s domain as he was states minister but Nehru encroached on his territory by running the Kashmir policy himself), Nehru tried to convince the latter that the support of the NC for India was indispensable. “It is equally clear to me,” he goes on to write, “that this can only take place with some measure of success after there is peace between the Maharaja and the NC and they co-operate together to meet the situation. This is not an easy task; but it can be done chiefly because Abdullah is very anxious to keep out of Pakistan and relies upon us a great deal for advice.”
Furthermore, Nehru apprised Patel that his line of thinking and that of Kashmiri Pandits was on the same plane: “This is the belief also of various minorities in Kashmir who have no other support to lean upon.” It was a time when Sheikh was still in prison. Nehru was in contact with him through KPs like Shamsunder Lal Dhar.
But why did Sheikh, then the most popular leader, support India? Did he believe in Gandhi’s nationalism rather than in MA Jinnah’s Two Nation Theory? I think he did not believe in anything except his own self-interest. He had been in jail at the time of Transfer of Power. Within a week of the emergence of Pakistan, Governor General Jinnah dismissed the elected government of the pro-Congress Red Shirts in NWFP on the ground that the creation of Pakistan, which they had opposed, meant that their mandate to rule the province had expired. Now, if Muslim Kashmir became a part of Pakistan on the ground of demography it would have meant that Sheikh would not be allowed to rule Kashmir given the fact that he too had opposed the creation of Pakistan and on top of that he was not an elected representative of Kashmiris. Sheikh would perhaps have swallowed the bitter pill, put on a sackcloth and fall on Jinnah’s feet, whom he had disgraced in Srinagar three years ago. But the award of Muslim majority Gurdaspur district to India against the Partition principle, which furnished India the only road link to Kashmir Valley via Jammu province, saved him from political doom. There was absolutely no need to be an elected representative to gain ascendance to political power if he supported India. Nehru would see to it that he became the PM no matter if Kashmiris liked it or not. Thus Gurdaspur district was awarded to India which made Nehru’s Kashmir schemes succeed.
Since the beginning of Mountbatten’s viceroyalty, Nehru had worked diligently to get Gurdaspur awarded to India against norms. Mountbatten was personally beholden to Nehru. The British government had appointed Mountbatten as the last viceroy of India to fulfil Nehru’s wish (p8 Freedom at Midnight by Dominique Lapierre and Larry Collins) because they desired that India should remain within the British commonwealth after the Transfer of Power and for that reason they wished to earn Nehru’s favour. So from day one Mountbatten tried to appease Nehru. He did everything in his power to upset Nehru’s political adversaries especially Jinnah whom he disliked for many reasons. Knowing that Nehru cherished a grand design on Kashmir and that he needed a road link to fulfil his dream, Mountbatten worked his influence to furnish him one via Pathankot, Gurdaspur.
It was on May 11, 1947, when Mountbatten raised the issue of keeping Gurdaspur beyond the purview of the Partition principle in a top-secret meeting with his staff, which Nehru attended in the capacity of vice-president of the interim government of British India. However, he met fierce opposition from deputy secretary Ian Scott which constrained him to assure the members present in the meeting that he would not press his demand and would instead ask the Boundary Commission “to handover from one side to the other any area within border districts where there was clearly a majority of the opposite community (pp.759, 760, & 781Transfer of Power Vol. X).”
It was a time when the partition of British India had not been officially decided nor had the Boundary Commission been set up but the fate of Kashmir was sealed. In the backdrop of ‘Mountbatten-Nehru Gurdaspur conspiracy’ it would be safe to presume that the decision to fly Indian troops to Kashmir on October 27, was not a sudden development consequent upon tribal incursion. The implementation of the plan had started on 11 May. Mountbatten’s June visit to Srinagar (and November visit to Lahore); and Mahatma Gandhi’s August visit to Kashmir were different links in the same chain. Gandhi came to Kashmir on August 2, 1947, to conspire against the pro-independence PM, RC Kak, otherwise he had no business to visit a country which was going to be independent in two weeks time. Mountbatten visited Srinagar in June to warn the Maharaja not to declare independence (p120 Mission with Mountbatten by AC-Johnson). Post Indian army’s intervention in Kashmir, Mountbatten went to Lahore to avert a Pakistani attack on Kashmir which Jinnah had ordered on October 27 – the order that was flouted by his acting Army Chief General Douglas Gracy. The Vicerene Edwina also contributed her share towards the success of Nehru’s Kashmir scheme. The bell tolled for Kashmir when on Mountbatten’s bidding Cyril Radcliffe of the Boundary Commission dropped Muslim majority Gurdaspur into Nehru’s lap. Nehru, now furnished with a road link to Kashmir, put Sheikh aside– courtesy KPs and waited for the Pakistani tribesmen to enter into Kashmir.
An interesting question: Who informed Nehru in September that tribesmen were preparing to enter Kashmir? Was it the Red Shirt Pathans of NWFP, whose government had been dismissed by Jinnah? and who were still on Congress payrolls? And who, (in addition to Manki Pir, Mamdot Pir, Qayoom Khan, and Sardar Ibrahim), instigated the tribesmen against Hari Singh’s government? These questions assume relevance given the fact that the Maharaja would not have submitted to Nehru’s demands of accession so tamely and so soon; and Nehru wouldn’t have gotten any justification to capture Kashmir in the absence of one furnished by the tribal invasion. Another important question: Was Sheikh kept in loop of the impending tribal invasion? Perhaps yes! On October 14, 1947, Sheikh took all his family members to Indore where his brother-in-law, Col Ghulam Nabi, a son of Harry Nedou, worked as private secretary to Yeshwant Rao Holkar.
Sheikh returned to Delhi and stayed at Nehru’s home until October 21. On the night of 24 October an officer of Dogra army arrived at a hotel in Amirakadal where Sheikh had shifted his party headquarters from Mujahid Manzil Zainakadal. This officer advised Sheikh to run away to safety because he feared tribesmen might overtake his office soon (pp425-26 Aatashi Chinar SM Abdullah). On the morning of October 25, Sheikh flew away to Delhi and again stayed at Nehru’s home. On the morning ofOctober 27, he came to Jammu in an aeroplane carrying Indian army personnel. On the last day of October he took oath as ‘Chief Emergency Administrator’ under Maharaja Hari Singh. He came to Srinagar only when it was well under Indian army’s control. All this suggests that New Delhi had a grand design on Kashmir which they successfully accomplished with the help of Sheikh and the NC party.
As far as Nehru’s promise of plebiscite is concerned, it was aimed at hoodwinking the world on one hand and on the other to keep open the option of capturing Hindu majority states of Junagarh and Hyderabad on the grounds of demography. This argument is strengthened by his statement on Kashmir policy to Patel in April 1949: “The prize we are fighting for is the Valley of Kashmir (p262 Sardar Patel’s Correspondence Vol.I). Pakistan’s tragic fault lies in the fact that they did not stop tribesmen from entering Kashmir. The tribal invasion proved counter productive to Kashmir.
—The author is a political historian. Feedback: [email protected]

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.